This week the Nature Chemistry team have been thinking about how we display our wonderful papers (when we finally open the doors and eventually publish a paper, anyway).
We’d really like to see what everyone else thinks about some of the things we discussed after looking at what other journals have to offer.
So, the things we’re interested in:
(1) HTML vs PDF: does anyone read the HTML articles? Do you read the PDF on-screen or print it out?
(2) Big vs little graphics: what does everyone else think about the tiny size of the graphics in ACS html articles?
(3) Tagging/’semantic web’: what do you think about the toys on the RSC’s Project Prospect? What kind of things would you like to see tagged/linked to other content in Nature Chemistry? For instance, Steve would love to do something with named reactions.
(4) 3D molecular structures: do these help your understanding of a paper?
(5) How useful to you are InChIs and SMILES?
(7) Would you actually comment on papers if there was a comments box at the end?
If we could get a deluge of posts about this one, we’d be overjoyed! And this is your chance to voice your opinion on what a Nature Chemistry paper should look like.
Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)