JJ: Day 98, Service with a ‘Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry Specification’
This week the Nature Chemistry team have been thinking about how we display our wonderful papers (when we finally open the doors and eventually publish a paper, anyway).
We’d really like to see what everyone else thinks about some of the things we discussed after looking at what other journals have to offer.
So, the things we’re interested in:
(1) HTML vs PDF: does anyone read the HTML articles? Do you read the PDF on-screen or print it out?
(2) Big vs little graphics: what does everyone else think about the tiny size of the graphics in ACS html articles?
(3) Tagging/’semantic web’: what do you think about the toys on the RSC’s Project Prospect? What kind of things would you like to see tagged/linked to other content in Nature Chemistry? For instance, Steve would love to do something with named reactions.
(4) 3D molecular structures: do these help your understanding of a paper?
(5) How useful to you are InChIs and SMILES?
(7) Would you actually comment on papers if there was a comments box at the end?
If we could get a deluge of posts about this one, we’d be overjoyed! And this is your chance to voice your opinion on what a Nature Chemistry paper should look like.
Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)