Finding a chokepoint of oxygen transfer in Ni–Fe CO dehydrogenase

Ni–Fe CO dehydrogenases (CODHs) can oxidize CO at a high rate, but their O2 sensitivity is a drawback for industrial applications. Revealing an essential residue in substrate tunnels of CODHs is the key to the development of biocatalysts capable of selectively removing CO from industrial flue gases.
Finding a chokepoint of oxygen transfer in Ni–Fe CO dehydrogenase

Carbon monoxide (CO), one of the critical C1 compounds in the chemical/energy industry, is an abundant and cheap source of carbon and energy1-3. However, as an anthropogenic air pollutant in industrial flue gas and an agent of human toxicity, CO is problematic. Biocatalytic CO dehydrogenase (CODH)-based oxidation, which is capable of selective and sustainable removal of CO from waste gas mixtures and its conversion to CO2 at room temperature, is a promisingly feasible and attractive technology for CO detoxification, carbon utilization, and energy generation from CO waste gas that includes, notably, the metal-catalyst inhibitors (ex. sulfur, chlorine, tar). Due to the permanent inactivation of CODHs under oxygen-stress conditions, their utilization for CO conversion under atmospheric conditions is challenging to say the least4-6. Therefore, we have pursued the development of effective and stable, tunnel-redesigned CODHs that show high CO oxidation rates even in the atmosphere.

To date, the only known aerobic CODH is represented by MoCu CODH enzyme7. On the contrary, NiFe CODHs are very sensitive against O2 except for two O2-tolerant forms: Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans (ChCODH-IV)8 and Desulfovibrio vulgaris (DvCODH)9. ChCODH-II shows the highest activity towards CO but is more sensitive to O2 than ChCODH-IV. The homodimeric ChCODH-II and ChCODH-IV contain five metal clusters: the [NiFe3S4] cluster at the catalytic site (C-cluster), the [Fe4S4] cubane-type cluster (B-cluster), and the [Fe4S4] cluster in the dimer interface (D-cluster), which is unlike the [Fe2S2] D-cluster in DvCODH, implying that the catalytic mechanisms of ChCODHs are similar due to the identical metal cluster contents.

For the design of O2-tolerant CODH, the first issue is the discovery of CODH’s key substrate tunnel regions related to oxygen transfer. Because the substrate tunnel within CODH’s structure is the only route for O2 transfer into the deeply buried catalytic site (C-cluster). In our tunnel analysis, we could distinguish the hydrophilic tunnels in ChCODH-II by the presence of water molecules within each tunnel. Two substrate tunnels formed by abundant hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues were readily predicted in ChCODH-II. Approximately 20~30 water molecules were found only in the hydrophilic tunnel of ChCODH-II10 but not in the hydrophobic gas tunnel. In the hydrophobic tunnel, six tunnel residues (I429, L539, V552, A571, L596, V610) of ChCODH-II aligned with common xenon-coordinating residues in DvCODH11 and MtCODH/acetyl-CoA synthase (ACS)12. Among these six residues, interestingly, two residues, L596 and V610, were related to those in the hydrophilic tunnels. Moreover, the alignment of ChCODH-II with the xenon-containing structure of ChCODH-V13 supported this interpretation. Thus, it seemed that hydrophilic tunnels non-selectively transfer various molecules (such as water, CO, and O2), whereas hydrophobic tunnels strictly limit water access.

The most exciting point is that the only significantly different tunnel residue was commonly located in a position of hydrophilic gas tunnels between O2-sensitive ChCODH-II and less O2-sensitive ChCODH-IV. All less O2-sensitive CODHs showed a narrow tunnel radius at the position (as a bottleneck). Consequently, we could hypothesize that oxygen molecules can pass through the hydrophilic tunnel and be selectively blocked by obstruction of the common bottleneck position. Notably, the typical bottleneck of substrate tunnels is found in most Ni–Fe CODHs, including CODH/ACS complexes involved in the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway.

Substituting one residue in a predicted tunnel within CO dehydrogenase-II from Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans (ChCODH-II) from Ala to Trp can decrease its O2 sensitivity without altering overall catalytic activity.
Figure. Tunnel-redesigned CO dehydrogenase. Substituting one residue in a predicted tunnel within CO dehydrogenase-II from Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans (ChCODH-II) from Ala to Trp can decrease its O2 sensitivity without altering overall catalytic activity.

We aimed to design a common bottleneck of Ni‒Fe CODH gas tunnels for high O2 tolerance, achieving up to 148-fold elevation by in-depth analysis of structural and molecular dynamics. Finally, we demonstrated CO conversion from industrial flue gases discharged from Hyundai Steel (one of the world's largest steel producers) under near-atmospheric conditions, as illustrated in the Figure above. This work reveals the A559 residue in all highly O2-sensitive CODHs from anaerobes. Our work with various syngas mixtures (CO, CO2, and H2) has significant biotechnological implications in demonstrating that this single mutation may enhance CO and CO2 bioconversion in industrial processes.

Developing a stable O2-tolerant enzyme as a CO-transformation catalyst would be an important stepping stone to effective carbon utilization. We believe this study will provide valuable insights into that biocatalyst and its application for using carbon in real flue gas without pretreatment.

Original paper DOI: 10.1038/s41929-022-00834-y


  1. Zhou, W. et al. New horizon in C1 chemistry: breaking the selectivity limitation in transformation of syngas and hydrogenation of CO2 into hydrocarbon chemicals and fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 3193–3228 (2019).
  2. Schuchmann, K. & Muller, V. Direct and reversible hydrogenation of CO2 to formate by a bacterial carbon dioxide reductase. Science 342, 1382–1385 (2013).
  3. Liu, Y., Deng, D. & Bao, X. Catalysis for Selected C1 Chemistry. Chem 6, 2497–2514 (2020).
  4. Can, M., Armstrong, F. A. & Ragsdale, S. W. Structure, function, and mechanism of the nickel metalloenzymes, CO dehydrogenase, and acetyl-CoA synthase. Chem. Rev. 114, 4149–4174 (2014).
  5. Appel, A. M. et al. Frontiers, opportunities, and challenges in biochemical and chemical catalysis of CO2 fixation. Chem. Rev. 113, 6621–6658 (2013).
  6. Lee, S. C., Lo, W. & Holm, R. H. Developments in the biomimetic chemistry of cubane-type and higher nuclearity iron–sulfur clusters. Chem. Rev. 114, 3579–3600 (2014).
  7. Rovaletti, A., Bruschi, M., Moro, G., Cosentino, U. & Greco, C. The challenging in silico description of carbon monoxide oxidation as catalyzed by molybdenum-copper CO dehydrogenase. Front. Chem. 6, 630 (2019).
  8. Domnik, L. et al. CODH-IV: a high-efficiency CO-scavenging CO dehydrogenase with resistance to O2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 15466–15469 (2017).
  9. Merrouch, M. et al. O2 inhibition of Ni-containing CO dehydrogenase is partly reversible. Chemistry 21, 18934–18938 (2015).
  10. Dobbek, H., Svetlitchnyi, V., Gremer, L., Huber, R. & Meyer, O. Crystal structure of a carbon monoxide dehydrogenase reveals a [Ni-4Fe-5S] cluster. Science 293, 1281–1285 (2001).
  11. Biester, A., Dementin, S. & Drennan, C. L. Visualizing the gas channel of a monofunctional carbon monoxide dehydrogenase. J. Inorg. Biochem. 230, 111774 (2022).
  12. Doukov, T. I., Blasiak, L. C., Seravalli, J., Ragsdale, S. W. & Drennan, C. L. Xenon in and at the end of the tunnel of bifunctional carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase. Biochemistry 47, 3474–3483 (2008).
  13. Jeoung, J. H. et al. A morphing [4Fe-3S-nO]-cluster within a carbon monoxide dehydrogenase scaffold. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202117000 (2022).

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Nature Portfolio Chemistry Community, please sign in